nav-left cat-right
cat-right

Notes on my other blogs.

I have a few other Blogs out there. Most are mirrors of this one in some form or other. Daniel’s Main Blog at Aelzina Anthroposophy at weblogs.us Daniel at BraveJournal.com Thoghts on Anthroposophy at BlogSpot.com Daniel at BlogSpirit Anthroposophy at Bravewriting.com Daniel at LiveJournal.com Anthroposophy at Blog-City.com Daniel at 22blog.com Daniel at...

Back from a break…

Well, I’ve taken some time off of this blog for the summer, and that stretched to the autumn as well. But I’ve been buisy with various things. Among others, I finished my site Defending Steiner. I will present a few things from there over here in the next couple of weeks.

Anthroposophy and Propoganda

Rudolf Steiner had some interesting views on the relationship of Anthroposophy to the methods of propaganda. “Anthroposophy – for this very reason – cannot find its way through the world by ordinary agitation or propaganda, no matter how well meant. Agitation kills true Anthroposophy. Anthroposophy must come forward because the Spirit impels it to come forward. It must show forth its life because life...

Professional skeptics

The professional skeptic makes an interesting study. A little skepticism is generally a healthy thing in this day and age. For most self-identified skeptics, it is the mood of skepticism, which borders on the cynical, that they seem to identify most strongly with. It is out of a mood that their thinking operates. The problem is that their thinking is not consistent. If skepticism is taken to it’s logical extreme, it...

An exercise in observation

Below is something I wrote for a workshop. The assignment was to stand outside for 15 minutes and note everything that you percieved with your senses. The loudest sound I heard was a sound between a plop and a plunk that came from my shoulders. Some of these sounds were louder than others. It was rain hitting my jacket. The larger drops made an almost popping noise as they hit the wet canvas surface of my coat. In closer to...

Some more thoughts on how to define ‘Anthrop...

Another way of approaching the question would be to ask, “Who would Anthroposophists recognizes their own?” Those who qualify would be those who in general accept the greater portion of Rudolf Steiner‘s teachings, or at least are among those who don’t actively reject significant portions of it. This disqualifies those who pick and choose and make their own philosophy of racial superiority out of bits...